In a recent issue of the British Medical Journal (BMJ), journalist Ray Moynihan wrote: “” (Subscription required for full access.) Excerpts:
“For anyone concerned about the creeping medicalisation of life, the marketplace for genetic testing is surely one of the latest frontiers, where apparently harmless technology can help mutate healthy people into fearful patients, their personhood redefined by multiple genetic predispositions for disease and early death.
Again a tool that’s proved useful in the laboratory has escaped like a virus into the marketplace, incubated by entrepreneurs, lazy reporters, and the power of our collective dreams of technological salvation, this time in the form of personalised medicine to treat us according to our individual genetic profiles.
Evaluating genetic tests is a complex business, requiring assessment of how well the test measures what it claims to measure, how well the genetic variation predicts actual disease, how useful the results are in terms of treatment, and what the social and ethical issues might be. Clearly there’s potential for exaggerating the value of a genetic test, which is one reason Germany has imposed severe restrictions on direct-to-consumer testing. In the United States they’re talking of a new test registry on a government website, raising immediate concerns that it could lend legitimacy to unproved and potentially harmful products. (more…)
*This blog post was originally published at*
Other Related Health Posts:
- Social Media May Be Better Than Tests And Credentials At Identifying Good Doctors
- Indian Drug Company Falsifies Data
- Social EMR And “Teh” Three Internets
- When Great Healthcare Is Served With A Large Helping Of Unnecessary Mental Anguish
- Outsourcing Relationships And Peddling Influence: Why Social Media Is Not Fun Anymore